So, the consistency of the OUP text going all the way back to the 1955 edition is basically confirmed. That's very interesting. I suppose the copyeditors were like "we'll verify the English words and the character names, and trust the author with the one-off exotic terms"... which they should apparently not have done, haha.
no subject
So, the consistency of the OUP text going all the way back to the 1955 edition is basically confirmed. That's very interesting. I suppose the copyeditors were like "we'll verify the English words and the character names, and trust the author with the one-off exotic terms"... which they should apparently not have done, haha.