So, the consistency of the OUP text going all the way back to the 1955 edition is basically confirmed. That's very interesting. I suppose the copyeditors were like "we'll verify the English words and the character names, and trust the author with the one-off exotic terms"... which they should apparently not have done, haha.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2022-03-15 09:13 pm (UTC)So, the consistency of the OUP text going all the way back to the 1955 edition is basically confirmed. That's very interesting. I suppose the copyeditors were like "we'll verify the English words and the character names, and trust the author with the one-off exotic terms"... which they should apparently not have done, haha.